I've got a moral dillemma I'd like to share with you all.
Let me setup the problem.
The first hole on the Priors course at Stapleford Abbotts GC is a par 5 (470 yds, SI 5) hole. The white and yellow tees are right next to the car park. Right in front of the tee box is a reservoir. A rough circle in shape and about 95 yards across.
I normally hit a driver from the tee, then hit a mid iron to layup short of the pond that guards the front of the green. The green is a good size but is narrow, and from the fairway its a wide green but only about 15 yards wide. There are mounds behind the green so if you go too far through the green you could have a nasty downhill chip.
To me the gamble is not worth the risk, so I layup with my second shot and rely on hitting the green with my third shot. If I get this on the green and two putt then I walk away with a par. I'm happy as I get a shot on this hole.
For those of you who have played here this is a lovely opening hole.
So the scene is set, so here is my problem.
They have moved the white and yellow tees to the ladies tee box, which has the reservoir behind it. The hole from the ladies tee is only 359 yards long, which is a par 4 to me!
My normal drive ends up between 200 and 230 yards, so if I hit my driver I'd be able to go for the green in two.
But for the last four rounds I've played this hole I've taken an iron from the tee and laid up with my second shot, just like I would do when playing from the men's tee.
The reason I do this is because I've never had a birdie on this hole and I feel it would be wrong to try and get a birdie when we are using the ladie's tee box.
They also have a short par 5 hole (15th), which from the front tees is really only a par 4, but I always play this hole from the back tees (they have two sets of tees for this hole).
So what would you do? Would you take advantage of this hole being shortened?
Russ