|
|
Ian Mullins
Handicap: 20
Essex
Pro Member
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 378
|
Apologies for doubting the score of one of the newer site members but whilst i can except (just?!) a score of 61 points off a 18 handicap - it does seem a little far fetched that they scored an exact 4 on each hole!! Surely some mistake? If not and a true score, please accept my humble apologies for doubting you...and do you give lessons? Ian M
|
|
|
Ian Halliwell
Handicap: 25
Lancashire
Joined: Aug 2008 Posts: 82
|
best i ever saw was a 56............best ive scored a 46...................61 el bandito or el tiger!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ian
|
|
|
Dougie Gray
Handicap: 36
Surrey
Joined: Jul 2009 Posts: 18
|
Surely something wrong in the calculations there ?? Even if we accept 4's at every hole (which is where the credibility card starts to wilt somewhat), then a 72 off 18 on a par 69 gives nett 15 under, or approximately 51 points stableford (36 + 15). The first hole (par 4, SI = 3) has four points awarded, indicating nett eagle ?? Must only be three points for nett birdie.. dg
|
|
|
Steve South
Handicap: 15
Surrey
Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 27
|
Ha! And its knocked me off the top of richmond park :-) Must try harder!
|
|
|
TheSocialGolfer
Handicap: 36
Essex
Pro Member
Joined: Jul 2007 Posts: 782
|
Yes, Mr Chaves seems certainly to have a consistent game - 18 holes all scored 4. If he can eliminate the bogeys on the Par-3s he'll be amazing ! I've left the scorecard for the time being because we want to understand why the discrepancy on the stableford points awarded on Hole 1.
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 1,955
|
As the card is Joao Chaves first one entered, the actual 61pts would of needed to be scored by a 28 h/c player not an 18. stroke indexs 1-10 have all been scored with two extra shots per hole. so the 17.6 h/c is what he has been "cut" to when the card was entered for handicap calculation. does seem a bit suspect, a 4 on every hole, plus he apparently lives in Porto, Portugal and plays at Richmond park :)
|
|
|
TheSocialGolfer
Handicap: 36
Essex
Pro Member
Joined: Jul 2007 Posts: 782
|
Hi Mark, you are of course correct. The Stableford score was correctly calculated based on the playing handicap of 28 and having shot a gross 72 off a 28 handicap (giving nett score of 44 !) the system, not unreasonably, cut him to 19.2. As Mr. Chaves has not responded to our request for clarification we're removed his account.
|
|
|
|
TSG
|